A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ETHICAL FRAMEWORKS: EXAMINING THE PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS OF UTILITARIANISM, DEONTOLOGY, AND VIRTUE ETHICS IN CONTEMPORARY MORAL DECISION MAKING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30890/2709-2313.2024-35-00-031Keywords:
analysis, ethical frameworks, the principles, applications, utilitarianism, deontology, virtue ethics, moral, decisionAbstract
The research paper conducts a comparative analysis of three major ethical theories: utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics, focusing on their core principles and contemporary relevance in moral decision-making. Utilitarianism aims to maximize overaMetrics
References
Cekić, N. CEEOL - Article Detail. (n.d.) recuperat din www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=638513
Marseille, E., Kahn, J. Utilitarianism and the ethical foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis in resource allocation for global health. (n.d.) din link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13010-019-0074-7
Felzmann, H. Utilitarianism as an Approach to Ethical Decision Making in Health Care. (n.d.) recuperat din link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-49250-6_3
Ofurum, U., Gabriel, J. Multidimensional ethical dilemmas of contemporary organizations: A Literature Review. (n.d.) recuperat din www.academia.edu
Shaw, W. Contemporary Ethics. (n.d.) recuperat din www.woldww.net
McGee, R. How Ethical Is Utilitarian Ethics? A Study in Artificial Intelligence. (n.d.) recuperat din papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4731871
Wolff, J. Making the World Safe for Utilitarianism. (n.d.) recuperat din www.cambridge.org
Jamieson, D. When Utilitarians Should Be Virtue Theorists. (n.d.) recuperat din www.cambridge.org
Ruggie, J. What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge. (n.d.) recuperat din www.cambridge.org
Micewski, E., Troy, C. Business Ethics – Deontologically Revisited. (n.d.) recuperat din link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-006-9152-z
Malomo, A., Bernstein, M. Ethics Principles and Theories. (n.d.) recuperat din link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-54980-9_2
Heinzelmann, N., Ugazio, G., Tobler, P. Top bar navigation. (n.d.) recuperat din www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2012.00094/full
Dehghani, M., Tomai, E., Forbus, K., Klenk, M. AAAI08-203. (n.d.) recuperat din cdn.aaai.org/AAAI/2008/AAAI08-203.pdf
McCoy, L. Ethical practice. (n.d.) recuperat din www.taylorfrancis.com
Nadeem, H. Legal Theory and Modern Healthcare: Shaping Society Through Emerging Medical Regulations. (n.d.) recuperat din www.researchgate.net
Bhola, P., Raguram, A. Navigating the ethical landscape: Critical issues in practice and training. (n.d.) recuperat din link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-10-1808-4_1
Henry, E., Jonathan, H. The Principle of Universalizability in Deontologists and Its Application to Leadership Decision-Making. (n.d.) recuperat din easychair.org/publications/preprint/zJzg/open
Audi, R. Virtue Ethics as a Resource in Business. (n.d.) recuperat din www.cambridge.org
Swanton, C. The notion of the moral: the relation between virtue ethics and virtue epistemology. (n.d.) recuperat din link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11098-013-0257-9
Maclagan, P. Conflicting obligations, moral dilemmas and the development of judgement through business ethics education. (n.d.) recuperat din onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Sekerka, L. Organizational ethics education and training: A review of best practices and their application. (n.d.) recuperat din onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Utley, R. Moral and Ethical Perspectives. (n.d.) recuperat din books.google.com
Slee, R., Tait, G. Virtue Ethics and the Possibilities of ‘Care’. (n.d.) recuperat January 9, 2025, din link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-97435-0_3
Sandler, R. Ethical Theory and the Problem of Inconsequentialism: Why Environmental Ethicists Should be Virtue-Oriented Ethicists. (n.d.) recuperat din link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10806-009-9203-4
Singleton, J. University of Hertfordshire Research Archive. (n.d.) recuperat din http://uhra.herts.ac.uk/handle/2299/1152
Macdonald, J., Beck-Dudley, C. Are deontology and teleology mutually exclusive?. (n.d.) recuperat din link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00871809
Lami, I., Mecca, B. Assessing Social Sustainability for Achieving Sustainable Architecture. (n.d.) recuperat din www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/142
Chahine, S., Cristancho, S., Padgett, J. How do small groups make decisions?. (n.d.) recuperat din link.springer.com/article/10.1007/S40037-017-0357-X
Stratil, J., Paudel, D., Setty, K. Advancing the WHO-INTEGRATE Framework as a Tool for Evidence-Informed, Deliberative Decision-Making Processes: Exploring the Views of Developers and Users of WHO Guidelines. (n.d.) recuperat din www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309924/
Pace, J., Ghinea, N., Kerridge, I., Lipworth, W. An ethical framework for the creation, governance and evaluation of accelerated access programs. (n.d.) recuperat January 9, 2025, din www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851018302768
Sakthivel, P. 44. (n.d.) recuperat din www.viirj.org/vol9issue2/44.pdf
Spalding, A., Lawrie, G. A Critical Examination of the AICPA’s New “Conceptual Framework” Ethics Protocol. (n.d.) recuperat din link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-017-3528-0
Collier, J. Theorising the Ethical Organization. (n.d.) recuperat din www.cambridge.org
Alina, P., Cimino, A., Coniglio, I. 15_Journal. (n.d.) recuperat din iris.unisalento.it/bitstream/11587/525866/1/15_Journal.pdf
Hong, D., Goh, J., Ong, Z., Ting, J., Wong, M. Postgraduate ethics training programs: a systematic scoping review. (n.d.) recuperat din link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-021-02644-5
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
