MODERNIZATION OF JUSTICE UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30890/2709-2313.2023-24-02-024Keywords:
innovative technologies, artificial intelligence, court, justice, modernization of the justice system, predictive justice, ethical standardsAbstract
The publication examines the influence of modern innovative technologies on the change of the traditional paradigm of justice. The experience of foreign countries regarding the use of artificial intelligence technologies in the justice system is analyzed,Metrics
References
Transforming our justice system, joint statement of the Lord Chancellor, the Lord Chief Justice and the Senior President of Tribunals. 2016. URL : https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/transforming-our-justice-system-joint-statement
Unified judiciary information telecommunication system development strategy URL: https://www.pravojustice.eu/storage/app/uploads/public/5de/a5b/208/5dea5b208e4aa763345125.pdf
Hallevy Gabriel. The criminal liability of artificial intelligence entities-from science fiction to legal social control. IdeaExchange. 2010. URL : http://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1037&context=akronintellectualproperty
Susskind Richard, Online courts and the future of justice. Oxford University Press. 2019. 347 p.
Lum Kristian, Isaac William. To predict and serve. In detail. 2016. URL: https://rss.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2016.00960.x
Daugherty Paul R., Wilson H. James. Human + Machine: Reimagining Work in the Age of AI. Harvard Business Press, 2018. 264 p
Niiler Eric. Can AI be a fair judge in court? Estonia thinks so. Outline. 2019. URL: https://outline.com/FH2WjX
Ruehl Giesela. China’s innovative Internet Courts and their use of blockchain backed evidence. Conflict of laws.net. 2019. URL: https://conflictoflaws.net/2019/chinas-innovative-internet-courts-and-their-use-of-blockchain-backed-evidence/
Du Guodong. Beijing Internet Court’s first year at a glance: inside China’s internet courts series – 05. China Justice Observer. 2019. URL: https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/beijing-internet-courts-first-year-at-a-glance
Jung J., Concannon C., Shroff R., Goel S. and Goldstein D. G. Simple rules to guide expert classifications. Royal Statistical Society, 2020. URL: https://5harad.com/papers/simple-rules.pdf
Policy paper on Asilomar principles on artificial intelligence. Federation of German Scientists e.V. (VDW). 2018. URL: https://vdw-ev.de/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/2018-08-13-Stellungnahme-englisch-end_se.pdf
Civil law rules on robotics, 2015/2013(INL) P8_TA-PROV(2017)0051, 17.02.2017. URL: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0051_EN.html
The European e-justice portal. URL: https://e-justice.europa.eu/home.do?plang=en&action=home
Правове регулювання штучного інтелекту: міжнародний досвід та українські перспективи URL: https://pravo.ua/pravove-rehuliuvannia-shtuchnoho-intelektu-mizhnarodnyi-dosvid-ta-ukrainski-perspektyvy/
EU AI Act: first regulation on artificial intelligence. URL: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/society/20230601STO93804/eu-ai-act-first-regulation-on-artificial-intelligence
Про схвалення Концепції розвитку штучного інтелекту в Україні: Розпорядження Кабінету міністрів України від 2 грудня 2020 р. № 1556-р URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1556-2020-%D1%80#Text
Мінцифри презентувало дорожню карту регулювання ШІ в Україні. URL: https://www.epravda.com.ua/news/2023/10/7/705212/
The OECD Privacy framework. 2013. 154 р. URL : https://www.oecd.org/internet/ieconomy/privacy-guidelines.htm
On the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation): Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. 27.04.2016. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj
Big data: a comlex and evolving regulatory framework. Digital transformation monitor. European Commission. 2017. 6 р. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/dem/monitor/sites/default/files/DTM_Big%20Data%20v1_0.pdf
Конвенція про захист прав людини і основоположних свобод, URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004
LOI n 2016-1321 du 7 octobre 2016 pour une République numérique. URL: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/eli/loi/2016/10/7/ECFI1524250L/jo/texte
Besold Tarek R., Uckelman Sara L. The What, the Why, and the How of Artificial Explanations in Automated Decision-Making. Cornell University. 2018. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.07074
Civil law rules on robotics, 2015/2013(INL) P8_TA-PROV(2017)0051, 17.02.2017. URL: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0051_EN.html
Solum Lawrence B. Legal Personhood for Artificial Intelligences. North Carolina law review. 1992. Volume 70. Issue 4. Р. 1231-1287.
Рустамзаде А.Х., Алиев И.М. Рассмотрение искусственного интеллекта через призму правосубъектности. Науковий вісник Ужгородського національного університету. Серія: Право. Том 63 (2021). С. 158-164. URL: http://visnyk-pravo.uzhnu.edu.ua/article/view/232222/231039
Putting the principles of the CEPEJ European Ethical Charter on the use of artificial intelligence in judicial systems into practice, with a certification perspective. CEPEJ. 2019. URL: https://rm.coe.int/draft-agenda-23sept2019-certification-work-2/1680973af5
Loevinger Lee. Jurimetrics: the methodology of legal inquiry. Law and Contemporary Problems. Winter. 1963. Р. 5-35. URL: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2945&context=lcp
Garapon Antoine, Lassegue Jean, Justice digitale, Revolution graphique et rupture antropologique. PUF. 2018. 353 p.
Patrick Kate. Arnold Foundation to Roll Out Pretrial Risk Assessment Tool Nationwide. Politics. 2018. URL: https://www.insidesources.com/arnold-foundation-to-roll-out-pretrial-risk-assessment-tool-nationwide/
Zambrano Guillaume. Precedents et predictions jurisprudentielles a l’ere des big data : parier sur le resultat (probable) d’un proces. 2015. URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01496098/document
Predictive justice and artificial intelligence supporting judge’s decision-making in Genoa. Sant’anna school and the court of genoa announce collaboration on computational analysis of the rulings. Sant’anna magazine. 2019. URL: https://www.santannapisa.it/en/news/predictive-justice-and-artificial-intelligence-supporting-judges-decision-making-genoa-santanna
Code de l’organisation judiciaire, URL: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCode.do?cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006071164
France Bans Judge Analytics, 5 Years In Prison For Rule Breakers URL: https://www.artificiallawyer.com/2019/06/04/france-bans-judge-analytics-5-years-in-prison-for-rule-breakers/
Legal analytics by Lex Machina. URL: https://lexmachina.com/
Ravel Law. URL: https://home.ravellaw.com/
Litigating algorithms, AI Now Institute Report. 2018. 17 р. URL: https://ainowinstitute.org/litigatingalgorithms.pdf
AI Now report 2018. AI Now Institute. New York University. 2018. 62 р. URL: https://ainowinstitute.org/AI_Now_2018_Report.pdf
Putting the principles of the CEPEJ European Ethical Charter on the use of artificial intelligence in judicial systems into practice, with a certification perspective. CEPEJ. 2019. URL: https://rm.coe.int/draft-agenda-23sept2019-certification-work-2/1680973af5
Sourdin Tania. Judges, Technology and Artificial Intelligence. The Artificial Judge. Edward Elgar publishing, 2021.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
